You might have caught word on the buzz surrounding Dr. Nun S. Amen Ra, The vegan, cyclic fasting, calorie restricting, strongman and meditator. On one level I enjoy stories like his. They challenge our thinking, our beliefs, and scientific convention. Just to give you an example, this guy does not eat meat and only eats 1000 to 1500 kilo-calories a day (at least he says). Science would generally tell you that definitely doesn’t allow you to build muscle, and probably doesn’t allow you to even maintain it if you’re at least moderately active. But this guy is doing it, and he is even the world champion of his class, so that is quite something. Quite something both for his life style in general as well as for the singular fact of his veganism. Very few body builders and strong men are vegan, and this proves it is possible. So props to him for that.
The problem with a story like this, I find, arises when you take the story of this guy who comes across as charismatic, tranquil/peaceful, in possession of a desirable body (especially in our culture a very big factor), and who speaks eloquently but authoritatively about his way of life. People in the West are restless, dissatisfied, always looking for the next big thing, always wanting better. If that is not bad enough, we have also been culturally programmed to seek truth outside of ourselves (possibly the rise in popularity of meditation is an unconscious counter move to this). Science has become a sort of manual for life. We take to Google when we feel a little sad and try to figure out what might make us happy again, instead of turning within and making an attempt at understanding ourselves. We can just see this from the vast amount of articles with tips on how to live a fulfilling life, how to beat depression or anxiety, how to be efficient or effective, how to anything.
Now I am not suggesting that science is evil. Science is awesome and very valuable. The problem, as ever, is in the balance. When we always take to science and statistics to figure out what path to take in life, and we never consider how things feel to us, what our intuition tells us, and the other subjective factors that necessarily influence the best path for us, we are bound to run off track. We will feel weak and inadequate when we are unable to apply objectively best approaches to our own lives, and implicitly emphasise to ourselves how we devalue our own experience in favour of the objective. We let outside factors decide what, for example, a “best life” ought to mean to us, and it’s not even ought anymore – it goes straight to is without a second thought. Like this video; the best life is apparently a life that is as long as possible, with physical strength, and mental tranquility. I am not denying that this sounds appealing to me too. The point is it might simply not be true for me. “Appeal” is influenced by our egos and the cultural programming. We have to look inward to know what is truly right for us. Maybe one day my ideal life will align with what was covered in this video, and maybe by then I will shift into that. Maybe my ideal life is never that. Maybe life called on me with an entirely different mission in mind, so to speak.
It seems like the more progress we make in technology with robotics and artificial intelligence, the more we attempt to treat people as machines and generalise approaches to life as if they can be installed like some computer program. They can’t, because we have vastly diverse genetic make up and vastly diverse socio-economic environments and vastly diverse life experiences. So straight from the heart, all I can advise you is to find out what is true for you.